ACP Journal Club. Clinically indicated and routine replacement of peripheral IV catheters did not differ for phlebitis.
نویسنده
چکیده
Outcomes: Primary outcome was phlebitis during use or within 48 hours of catheter removal. Phlebitis was defined as simultaneous presentation of ≥ 2 of the following: patient-reported pain or tenderness, with severity ≥ 2 on a 10-point scale; erythema extending ≥ 1 cm from insertion site; swelling extending ≥ 1 cm from insertion site; purulent discharge; or palpable venous cord beyond the catheter tip. 3000 patients were needed to detect equivalence of therapies at 4% phlebitis (equivalence margin 3%) with 95% power (α = 0.05).
منابع مشابه
Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVE To compare routine replacement of intravenous peripheral catheters with replacement only when clinically indicated. DESIGN Randomised controlled trial. SETTING Tertiary hospital in Australia. PARTICIPANTS 755 medical and surgical patients: 379 allocated to catheter replacement only when clinically indicated and 376 allocated to routine care of catheter (control group). MAIN OU...
متن کاملRoutine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial.
BACKGROUND The millions of peripheral intravenous catheters used each year are recommended for 72-96 h replacement in adults. This routine replacement increases health-care costs and staff workload and requires patients to undergo repeated invasive procedures. The effectiveness of the practice is not well established. Our hypothesis was that clinically indicated catheter replacement is of equal...
متن کاملCost-effectiveness analysis of clinically indicated versus routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters.
BACKGROUND Millions of peripheral intravenous catheters are used worldwide. The current guidelines recommend routine catheter replacement every 72-96 h. This practice requires increasing healthcare resource use. The clinically indicated catheter replacement strategy is proposed as an alternative. OBJECTIVES To assess the cost effectiveness of clinically indicated versus routine replacement of...
متن کاملClinically indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters in adults: A nonblinded, cluster-randomized trial in China.
AIM The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety of clinically indicated peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC) replacement intervals. BACKGROUND Peripheral intravenous catheters are used internationally, including in China where PIVCs are routinely replaced every 72 to 96 hours. Despite some recent international evidence showing such routine replacement is unnecessary, developing...
متن کاملRoutine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND Peripheral intravenous device (IVD) complications were traditionally thought to be reduced by limiting dwell time. Current recommendations are to resite IVDs by 96 hours with the exception of children and patients with poor veins. Recent evidence suggests routine resite is unnecessary, at least if devices are inserted by a specialised IV team. The aim of this study was to compare the...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Annals of internal medicine
دوره 158 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013